منابع مشابه
Why good projects fail anyway.
Big projects fail at an astonishing rate--more than half the time, by some estimates. It's not hard to understand why. Complicated long-term projects are customarily developed by a series of teams working along parallel tracks. If managers fail to anticipate everything that might fall through the cracks, those tracks will not converge successfully at the end to reach the goal. Take a companywid...
متن کاملWhy Large IT Projects Fail
Large IT projects may not deliver what they promise. Often they are late. Often they are over budget. Often what is eventually delivered is not either what was originally specified nor what is actually needed. There are many reasons why this happens. We discuss some of those reasons here and argue that many of them are a consequence of failure to specify requirements anything like adequately. W...
متن کاملWhy do Banks Fail ?
Banks advance loans in the absence of precise knowledge in relation to the outcome of borrowers’ projects. Consequently, uncertainty in relation to loan repayment emerges. Thus, banks introduce the ‘credit standard’ as insurance against loans, so that should borrowers’ projects fail, borrowers have an alternative means of honouring their debt obligations. It is argued in this paper that in the ...
متن کاملWhy do eGovernment Projects Fail? Risk Factors of Large Information Systems Projects in the Greek Public Sector: An International Comparison
This paper presents an empirical study of the risk factors of large governmental information systems (IS) projects. For this purpose the Official Decisions of the Greek Government Information Technology Projects Advisory Committee (ITPAC) concerning 80 large IS projects have been analyzed and interviews with its members have been conducted. From this analysis 21 risk factors have been identifie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Procedia Computer Science
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1877-0509
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.124